#wcag
6 posts
Consistent Help, Computed: What an AI Design Agent Can and Cannot Check in WCAG 2.2 SC 3.2.6
SC 3.2.6 Consistent Help is Level A, and its documented test runs on serialized order. A computable check for AI design agents, plus its limits.
WCAG 3.3.8 Accessible Authentication (Minimum): A Computable Checklist for Login Flows
Success Criterion 3.3.8 restated as seven machine-checkable signals an AI design agent can flag in a login flow, with the boundary of what only human verification can settle.
WCAG 1.4.10 Reflow: A Computable Check for Design Agents
How AI design agents can compute WCAG 1.4.10 Reflow: the 320 CSS px test, viewport meta rules, ACT rule b4f0c3, and the exempt-table pattern.
WCAG 2.5.7 Dragging Movements: A Computable Contract for AI Design Agents
WCAG 2.5.7 Dragging Movements: what an AI design agent can detect mechanically, what needs a human rubric, and the single-pointer alternatives W3C documents.
Accessibility Compliance for AI Design Agents: EAA, EN 301 549, WCAG 2.2 AA, and What Your Tools Can't See
What the European Accessibility Act, EN 301 549 and WCAG 2.2 AA require, which accessibility criteria an AI design agent can compute, where automated tools stop, and why upstream constraints beat overlays.
The 94.8% That Proves Design Quality Can Be Automated
94.8% of websites fail basic accessibility standards and ADA lawsuits hit 5,114 in 2025. For AI design agents, accessibility is the one domain where quality is specified, computable, and legally enforceable — the difference between a pre-deploy lint and a runtime audit.